I have always factored an inverter at 10%. To explain, this is using the tried and tested 12VDC to 240VAC inverter.
i.e. if the load is 2,400W AC the current is 10A AC. Then divide that wattage by 10 (Not the 12V of the battery) = 240A from the DC source. This then takes care of the efficiency losses, which for a good quality 12V inverter is OK.
I had a 300W - 12V RV inverter installed many years ago and it showed a battery load of 29A at almost full load, which qualifies this assumption.
The point I was making in my testing results is; Compared to the AC180, which has the same size inverter as the E1v2 and with the same load tested on both, the E1v2’s displayed watts were higher than the displayed watts on the AC180. This raises the Question - Why? I should note this was on one device, my home fridge. Other tests like the “big” TV, were very similar from both the E1v2 and AC180, with the Elite being only slightly higher, in the order of <2% at a similar wattage to the fridge. The 400W strip heater, a 4 x higher load, showed a similar, but very small difference.
I have not yet had the opportunity to do this; On return from my trip, I am going to test both the AC180 and the Elite 100 v2 on the home fridge. Both fully charged and run until the capacity shows 5%. (I don’t want to run flat, because the effect upon an inverter compressor is unknown).
The run time, known capacity, plus the power meter displayed Wh, should give a comparison sufficient compare efficiency between the 2 inverters.
I also accept that the inverter loss from a power station, might be at 15% due to the same losses, as above, and the added internal management loads, that a “dumb” inverter does not require.
The 10% part of Bluetti’s capacity calculation is not inverter related, it is a cap on usable capacity, so the battery is not totally depleted even though the display shows 0%.