Official Bluetti Device API Survey

Hey everyone!

we finally have a official survey from Bluetti! Its about what devices we wish to have any kind of API (like to use in HomeAssistant) and what functionalitys we expect.

Hoping for many votes in this form:

Also calling all people, that participate in the HomeAssistant thread to give your vote here

@SigiKa
@southside
@jphoward
@Barf
@EtchedPixels
@ndwr
@User2589
@tscher

Thanks in advanced for voting your choices!
Erik

Thanks everyone for participating! We reached about 100 votes!

4 Likes

just done ;-)

And please don’t forget the off-grid parallel configurations (especially with the home battery systems EP600, EP760, etc)
This has cost me countless hours of searching, as several bluetooth parameter addresses are shifted when connected in parallel!

Did you write this in the “Others” Field? That would be important

Of course, but the “Others” field was labelled in German, so I filled in the “Sonstiges” field …

Yeah, its in the native language depending on from where you access the form.

Thanks for your contribution to this survey!

Call received!
Thank you for sharing the form. Just did it.
.
There is an interesting data collection feature inside the ESP module of the EP760 which is a sort of energy log and is built by canbus data message ID 0x11 and 0x14 which represent the accumulated energy data of various sources like load, pv, grid or generator. The log is divided by day, month and year and it can be useful to have it exported through this new API system to have a complete collection of the accumulated data, which can be consulted at any time or displayed in Home Assistant.

Thanks Erik for organizing this.

Survey completed.

Regards,

Jeff.

Thanks for your contribution!

Sounds interesting. Hopefully they are able to implement it :slight_smile:

1 Like

survey filled, hopefully something will happen in the future…

1 Like

Did when it first appeared. Hopefully we’ll get something useful from it.

1 Like

Hi, I do not know how to express my gratitude to anyone who decided integrate local API avilable to use in Home Assistant.

That will be game changer and life saver.

I was considering bluetti and anker but because of local API choices will be easier fotlr alll my future purchases and for my clients.

I would like kindly ask for prioritise this integration.

Thank you in advance.

1 Like

There is a lot going on lately. Lets hope we see some nice results soon :)

1 Like

Could anyone confirm if AC70 will get api via bluetooth? If not confirmed I will have to return that imedietly.

Where is the Home Assistant thread?

This one?

+1, we need this, can’t do any automation without it

2 Likes

Recently got a new AC180, after the old one started playing. Really disappointed to find it has stopped working with Home Assistant, with the warhammer, and others, integration. I feel it is imperative, that it is controllable within Home assistant, as there are so many user in the same position, as demonstrated already by the number of availabe efforts on Github.
The only output is via bluetooth, so, some how this needs to be readable by home assistant. Whereas, at the moment, with the warhammer integration, we have to run a python script in the background on a PC, that then sends MQTT to home assistant.
Or
Something like the " hassio-bluetti-bt", which does not now connect to new encrypted machines.
Or
Perhaps, if Bluetti could produce , something like an ESPHome, type of dongle, that could connect to the power station, via bluetooth and then, that information could be availabe via wifi sent to Home assistant, maybe.
.
But ultimately, I agree we need “an official MQTT/HomeAssistant/HomeAutomation integration for Bluetti products”. I can’t believe it would be that difficult for the team at Bluetti, who have all the required information, rather than relying, on independent users to hack into the sytem,
.
Anyone who reads these post, I would strongly urge, to comment, to let Bluetti, know the strength of feeling.
Apologies, if this is a bit longwinded.

They work on it. Bluetti already provide a encryption module

Thats the main problem. Every function needs to be reverse engineered. The devs know all the modbus registers and could easily merge new function into projects